Answer & Explanation:see attachments and thanks for your assistance
hrmn_495_assignment_four.docx
hrmn_495_assignment_four_rubric.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
HRMN 495 Assignment four
Instructions
Final Knowledge Gained and Further Development Activity
In this final paper, students will draw upon knowledge gained in both this capstone class, but
also other classes they have taken in their degree program. Students will select two of the
following concepts that represent key concepts related to the key knowledge areas in HR For the
selected concept, students will describe, in at least 275 words, the concept selected, knowledge
about it with scholarly support for the statements. Provide at least two scholarly sources for your
information. Include a title page and a reference page for the paper. Use topic heading to identify
the segments of the paper.
1. Title Page
2. Introduction and Purpose of Paper
3. Concept Selected
A. Academic definitions of the key terms
B. The value that is added to the organization through the concept
C. Examples of the concept in practice
D. Risks of not utilizing the concept
E. Your personal evaluation of your own competencies in the concept area
F. How you will continue to develop your competencies in the area and how you will apply
the concept in your own organization
4. Concluding Comments on Knowledge of the HR function
5. Reference Page
Choose from the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
HR Competencies for the 21st Century
The Strategic Role of Human Resources
HR Metrics that Matter
The HR So That Statement
5. Differentiation of Rewards and Segmentation of Current or Potential
6. Employment Brand
7. Employee Engagement
Employees
Rubric Assessment
Close this Dialog
Rubric Name: Assignment 4: Knowledge Gained and
Personal Assessment (16%)
Criteria
Level 5 Exceeds
Expectations
4 points
Definitions are
complete, relevant,
current and supported
Criterion 1
with outstanding
Academic
academic citation
definitions of the
(s). The value to the
key terms; The
organization was
value that is
explained well and
added to the
was convincing in
organization
both an academic and
through the
professional manner.
concept
The topic selected
exceeded the
expectations.
Examples were
excellent, relevant and
insightful. Risks were
Criterion 2 identified in an also
Examples of the insightful manner and
concept in
were justified
practice; Risks robustly. Scholarly
of not utilizing support was given for
the concept the assertions made.
The segment exceeded
that of most
submissions.
Level 4 Meets
Expectations
3.6 points
Definitions are
complete,
relevant, current
and supported
with academic
citation (s). The
value to the
organization was
explained and
was convincing
in both an
academic and
professional
manner. Each of
the two topic
areas met the
expectations for
the assignment.
Examples were
good, relevant
and
insightful. Risks
were identified in
an also insightful
manner and were
justified
adequately.
Scholarly support
was given for the
assertions made
Level 3 Meets Some
Expectations
3.2 points
Level 2 Does Not Meet
Expectations
2.5 points
Combined, the
twp concept areas did
For the two concept
not met the
areas, some but not all expectations. Definitions
met the
were not complete,
expectations. Definitions relevant, current and/or
were not complete,
supported with academic
relevant, current and/or citation (s). The value to
supported with academic the organization was
citation (s). The value to explained in some but
the organization was
not all and was not all
explained in some but
were convincing in both
not all and was not all
an academic and
were convincing in both professional manner.
an academic and
Overall, the segment did
professional manner.
not meet the
expectations for the
capstone class.
The examples and risks The examples and risks
identified met some of identified did not met
the expectations of being the expectations of
appropriate, relevant and being appropriate,
insightful. Risks were
relevant and
identified but could have insightful. Risks were
been justified more
wither not identified or
robustly. Scholarly
but could have been
support was given for
justified more robustly.
the assertions made but Scholarly support was
not in a fully convincing either not given for the
manner.
assertions made or were
Criterion 3
Your personal
evaluation of
your own
competencies in
the concept;
How you will
continue to
develop your
competencies in
the concept and
how you will
apply the
concept in your
own
organization
Criterion 4
Academic
Writing Style
Including
Introduction,
Purpose
Statement,
Citations and
References
Overall Score
in a manner that
met the
expectations for
an upper level
course. .
For the two areas
selected, the
For the area selected,
personal
the personal
evaluation is
evaluation is credible
credible and
and candid with
candid with
convincing
convincing
information shared.
information
The evaluation is very
shared. It was
well written and
written in a good
explained. Explanation
manner. The
is thorough,
explanation is
convincing and
thorough,
relevant to the
convincing and
organization. It
relevant to the
exceeds the
organization. The
expectations for the
segment meets
personal evaluation
the general
and relevance to the
expectations for a
organization.
capstone level
course.
Generally writes
in an error free
Writes in an error free manner, includes
manner, includes all all the required
the required elements, elements, writing
writing is clear,
is mostly clear,
logical, flows well and logical, flows
is convincing.
well and is
Citations and
convincing.
references are
Citations and
provided in accurate references are
APA format
provided and are
in accurate APA
format.
Level 5 Exceeds
Level 4 Meets
Expectations
Expectations
14.5 or more
13 or more
14.5 to 16 Points
13 to 14.4 Points
not in a fully convincing
manner. This segment
did not meet the
expectations of a upper
level course.
For most of the concpets
The personal evaluation
selected, the personal
is not credible and/or
evaluation is credible
candid with convincing
and candid with
information shared for
convincing
the two concept areas.
information. Explanation
Explanations for each is
for most is thorough,
not as thorough,
convincing and relevant
convincing and/or
to the organization.
relevant to the
Some but not all the
organization as was
expectations for the
expected.
entire two were met.
In a portion but not all
the final paper, the
Generally does not write
writing style was in an
in an error free manner,
error free manner,
does not include all the
includes all the required
required elements, does
elements, writing is
not writing is a mostly
mostly clear, logical,
clear, logical manner
flows well and is
and is not always
convincing. Citations
convincing. Citations
and references are not all
and references are not
provided and/or are not
provided and/or are not
all in accurate APA
in accurate APA format.
format for some but not
all the sources.
Level 3 Meets Some Level 2 Does Not Meet
Expectations
Expectations
11.3 or more
10 or more
11.3 to 12.9 Points
10 to 11.2 Points
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Order a plagiarism free paper now. We do not use AI. Use the code SAVE15 to get a 15% Discount
Looking for help with your ASSIGNMENT? Our paper writing service can help you achieve higher grades and meet your deadlines.
Why order from us
We offer plagiarism-free content
We don’t use AI
Confidentiality is guaranteed
We guarantee A+ quality
We offer unlimited revisions